Architectural Creativity Results
During this jam, 8 entries were submitted between November 17, 2023 @ 10:00 pm UTC and December 31, 2023 @ 10:00 pm UTC.
68 ratings were given to 8 entries between December 31, 2023 @ 10:00 pm UTC and January 12 @ 10:00 pm UTC.
The average number of ratings per entry was 8.50 and the median was 8.5.
Criteria description
This criterion evaluates the uniqueness and originality of the tower design. Consider how innovative and imaginative the construction is.
1 - 8 of 8
-
-
Ranked 1st for Architectural Creativity
with a score of out of 10 from 8 ratings.
JUDGE RATINGS
Criteria | Ranked | Score* | Raw Score | Max |
Architectural Creativity | 1st | 7.640 | 7.875 | 10 |
Structural Complexity | 3rd | 7.397 | 7.625 | 10 |
Aesthetic Appeal | 1st | 4.244 | 4.375 | 5 |
Overall Score | 2nd | 19.282 | 19.875 | 25 |
-
-
Ranked 2nd for Architectural Creativity
with a score of out of 10 from 9 ratings.
JUDGE RATINGS
Criteria | Ranked | Score* | Raw Score | Max |
Architectural Creativity | 2nd | 7.556 | 7.556 | 10 |
Structural Complexity | 1st | 8.556 | 8.556 | 10 |
Aesthetic Appeal | 5th | 3.889 | 3.889 | 5 |
Overall Score | 1st | 20.000 | 20.000 | 25 |
-
-
Ranked 3rd for Architectural Creativity
with a score of out of 10 from 8 ratings.
JUDGE RATINGS
Criteria | Ranked | Score* | Raw Score | Max |
Architectural Creativity | 3rd | 7.276 | 7.500 | 10 |
Structural Complexity | 5th | 7.034 | 7.250 | 10 |
Aesthetic Appeal | 7th | 3.638 | 3.750 | 5 |
Overall Score | 5th | 17.948 | 18.500 | 25 |
-
-
Ranked 4th for Architectural Creativity
with a score of out of 10 from 9 ratings.
JUDGE RATINGS
Criteria | Ranked | Score* | Raw Score | Max |
Architectural Creativity | 4th | 7.111 | 7.111 | 10 |
Structural Complexity | 4th | 7.333 | 7.333 | 10 |
Aesthetic Appeal | 4th | 4.000 | 4.000 | 5 |
Overall Score | 3rd | 18.444 | 18.444 | 25 |
-
-
Ranked 5th for Architectural Creativity
with a score of out of 10 from 9 ratings.
JUDGE RATINGS
Criteria | Ranked | Score* | Raw Score | Max |
Architectural Creativity | 5th | 6.889 | 6.889 | 10 |
Structural Complexity | 2nd | 7.444 | 7.444 | 10 |
Aesthetic Appeal | 3rd | 4.111 | 4.111 | 5 |
Overall Score | 4th | 18.444 | 18.444 | 25 |
-
-
Ranked 6th for Architectural Creativity
with a score of out of 10 from 8 ratings.
JUDGE RATINGS
Criteria | Ranked | Score* | Raw Score | Max |
Architectural Creativity | 6th | 6.670 | 6.875 | 10 |
Structural Complexity | 6th | 6.427 | 6.625 | 10 |
Aesthetic Appeal | 6th | 3.881 | 4.000 | 5 |
Overall Score | 6th | 16.977 | 17.500 | 25 |
-
-
Ranked 7th for Architectural Creativity
with a score of out of 10 from 9 ratings.
JUDGE RATINGS
Criteria | Ranked | Score* | Raw Score | Max |
Architectural Creativity | 7th | 6.333 | 6.333 | 10 |
Structural Complexity | 7th | 6.222 | 6.222 | 10 |
Aesthetic Appeal | 2nd | 4.111 | 4.111 | 5 |
Overall Score | 7th | 16.667 | 16.667 | 25 |
-
-
Ranked 8th for Architectural Creativity
with a score of out of 10 from 8 ratings.
JUDGE RATINGS
Criteria | Ranked | Score* | Raw Score | Max |
Architectural Creativity | 8th | 5.093 | 5.250 | 10 |
Structural Complexity | 8th | 5.821 | 6.000 | 10 |
Aesthetic Appeal | 8th | 3.395 | 3.500 | 5 |
Overall Score | 8th | 14.310 | 14.750 | 25 |
1 - 8 of 8