Aesthetic Appeal Results
During this jam, 8 entries were submitted between November 17, 2023 @ 10:00 pm UTC and December 31, 2023 @ 10:00 pm UTC.
68 ratings were given to 8 entries between December 31, 2023 @ 10:00 pm UTC and January 12 @ 10:00 pm UTC.
The average number of ratings per entry was 8.50 and the median was 8.5.
Criteria description
Focuses on the visual impact of the tower. Assess the overall beauty, color scheme, and harmony of the design with its surroundings.
1 - 8 of 8
-
-
Ranked 1st for Aesthetic Appeal
with a score of out of 5 from 8 ratings.
JUDGE RATINGS
Criteria | Ranked | Score* | Raw Score | Max |
Architectural Creativity | 1st | 7.640 | 7.875 | 10 |
Structural Complexity | 3rd | 7.397 | 7.625 | 10 |
Aesthetic Appeal | 1st | 4.244 | 4.375 | 5 |
Overall Score | 2nd | 19.282 | 19.875 | 25 |
-
-
Ranked 2nd for Aesthetic Appeal
with a score of out of 5 from 9 ratings.
JUDGE RATINGS
Criteria | Ranked | Score* | Raw Score | Max |
Architectural Creativity | 7th | 6.333 | 6.333 | 10 |
Structural Complexity | 7th | 6.222 | 6.222 | 10 |
Aesthetic Appeal | 2nd | 4.111 | 4.111 | 5 |
Overall Score | 7th | 16.667 | 16.667 | 25 |
-
-
Ranked 3rd for Aesthetic Appeal
with a score of out of 5 from 9 ratings.
JUDGE RATINGS
Criteria | Ranked | Score* | Raw Score | Max |
Architectural Creativity | 5th | 6.889 | 6.889 | 10 |
Structural Complexity | 2nd | 7.444 | 7.444 | 10 |
Aesthetic Appeal | 3rd | 4.111 | 4.111 | 5 |
Overall Score | 4th | 18.444 | 18.444 | 25 |
-
-
Ranked 4th for Aesthetic Appeal
with a score of out of 5 from 9 ratings.
JUDGE RATINGS
Criteria | Ranked | Score* | Raw Score | Max |
Architectural Creativity | 4th | 7.111 | 7.111 | 10 |
Structural Complexity | 4th | 7.333 | 7.333 | 10 |
Aesthetic Appeal | 4th | 4.000 | 4.000 | 5 |
Overall Score | 3rd | 18.444 | 18.444 | 25 |
-
-
Ranked 5th for Aesthetic Appeal
with a score of out of 5 from 9 ratings.
JUDGE RATINGS
Criteria | Ranked | Score* | Raw Score | Max |
Architectural Creativity | 2nd | 7.556 | 7.556 | 10 |
Structural Complexity | 1st | 8.556 | 8.556 | 10 |
Aesthetic Appeal | 5th | 3.889 | 3.889 | 5 |
Overall Score | 1st | 20.000 | 20.000 | 25 |
-
-
Ranked 6th for Aesthetic Appeal
with a score of out of 5 from 8 ratings.
JUDGE RATINGS
Criteria | Ranked | Score* | Raw Score | Max |
Architectural Creativity | 6th | 6.670 | 6.875 | 10 |
Structural Complexity | 6th | 6.427 | 6.625 | 10 |
Aesthetic Appeal | 6th | 3.881 | 4.000 | 5 |
Overall Score | 6th | 16.977 | 17.500 | 25 |
-
-
Ranked 7th for Aesthetic Appeal
with a score of out of 5 from 8 ratings.
JUDGE RATINGS
Criteria | Ranked | Score* | Raw Score | Max |
Architectural Creativity | 3rd | 7.276 | 7.500 | 10 |
Structural Complexity | 5th | 7.034 | 7.250 | 10 |
Aesthetic Appeal | 7th | 3.638 | 3.750 | 5 |
Overall Score | 5th | 17.948 | 18.500 | 25 |
-
-
Ranked 8th for Aesthetic Appeal
with a score of out of 5 from 8 ratings.
JUDGE RATINGS
Criteria | Ranked | Score* | Raw Score | Max |
Architectural Creativity | 8th | 5.093 | 5.250 | 10 |
Structural Complexity | 8th | 5.821 | 6.000 | 10 |
Aesthetic Appeal | 8th | 3.395 | 3.500 | 5 |
Overall Score | 8th | 14.310 | 14.750 | 25 |
1 - 8 of 8